Eleventh Circuit Rejects Georgia's Copyright for the Annotations to the Official Code of Georgia

Legal Alert

A government cannot copyright a statute, but what about the annotations to the statute? In Code Revision Commission v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., Case No. 17-11589 (decided Oct. 19, 2018), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the annotations to the Georgia Code were part of the Code and could not be copyrighted by the State of Georgia.

Like many state codes, Georgia’s Official Code is published with annotations including describing relevant case law applying the provisions of the Code. Those annotations are prepared by a private company under contract with the State of Georgia. That company also has a license to publish the Code and its annotations. The State of Georgia holds the copyright for those annotations. The Georgia General Assembly annually approves revisions to the Code. The annotations are deemed a part of the Code although they may not limit or expand the construction of any Code section. Opinion, p. 6.

Another private entity began to publish a complete version of the Georgia Code including the annotations. Although the State of Georgia did not claim a copyright in the text of the statutes, it claimed a copyright in the annotations and filed a lawsuit seeking to prevent the unauthorized publication of the annotations. The State of Georgia prevailed in the trial court. However, the Eleventh Circuit reversed.

The Eleventh Circuit relied upon old Supreme Court precedents recognizing that the text of statutes and judicial opinions were not copyright-able because the public has a right of access to published laws and court decisions. The Eleventh Circuit emphasized that the General Assembly embodied the collective sovereignty of the people. Consequently, the State of Georgia could not invoke copyright law to limit public access to materials it created while exercising those sovereign powers. Although the annotations may have been initially prepared by a private party, the annotations are annually approved by the General Assembly and by statute became a part of the Official Code. Therefore, the annotations are deemed a part of the law and not copyright-able.

Related Capabilities

Media Contact

Public Relations Contact
Kate Lenders
Senior Marketing Manager
klenders@sgrlaw.com
312-360-6478

Jump to Page

Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek