Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure For Objecting to Jury Instructions

Legal Alert

In McDowell v. Hartzog, Georgia Supreme Court Case No. S12G0369 (decided January 7, 2013), the Georgia Supreme Court clarified the means by which an attorney preserves an objection to jury instructions in a civil case. 

O.C.G.A. § 5-5-24(a) requires that a party preserve an objection to a jury instruction by making a specific objection before the jury returns a verdict.  That objection must state distinctly the grounds for the objection.  Under existing case law, an objection made during the charge conference is insufficient to preserve a claim of error.  Attorneys must state their objections after the trial judge instructs the jury.

In McDowell, the plaintiffs’ attorney objected to a jury instruction during the charge conference, stating specific grounds.  However, after the trial judge instructed the jury, the plaintiffs’ counsel only pointed out to the trial judge his earlier objections without restating the specific grounds for the objections.  The Georgia Court of Appeals had held that such an objection was insufficient.  However, the Georgia Supreme Court reversed.  The Georgia Supreme Court held that because the attorney had stated specific ground for the objection during the charge conference, he adequately preserved the issue for appeal by referencing that earlier objection after the trial judge instructed the jury.  The Georgia Supreme Court concluded that no purpose was served by requiring counsel to restate fully the same grounds for objecting.

It is worth noting that it is still the law in Georgia that merely stating an objection during the charge conference is not sufficient to preserve for appeal an objection to a jury instruction.  After the trial court instructs the jury, counsel must still do something to restate the objection, if only to refer to an earlier detailed objection made during the charge conference.

Related Capabilities

Media Contact

Public Relations Contact
Kate Lenders
Senior Marketing Manager
klenders@sgrlaw.com
312-360-6478

Jump to Page

Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek
gazebo17