On Friday, January 6, the White House issued its long awaited guidance telling federal agencies how to consider climate impacts on permitting decisions. The guidance details the need to make sure the depth of analysis undertaken by the agency is proportional to a project’s impact. The document also gives agencies authority to perform a less detailed analysis for projects that are deemed to reduce emissions, such as clean energy projects, as well as encouraging agencies to engage with affected communities, and to factor in environmental justice considerations in their analysis. The new guidance is designed to work in concert with… Read more

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is set to rule on a challenge by an asphalt emulsions manufacturing company alleging that the EPA unlawfully required its facility to maintain a Facility Response Plan (“FRP”) simply because of its proximity to navigable waters. The Regulation in question requires a facility to prepare an FRP if, “because of its location, it could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment by discharging oil into or on the navigable waters or adjacent shorelines.” The “substantial harm” test is fulfilled when a facility’s total oil storage capacity exceeds… Read more

Apple, Inc. has set an ambitious carbon-neutrality goal, which it hopes to achieve by 2030. Key to achieving this goal is an ambitious recycling plan. Apple has already slashed the Company’s aluminum related carbon emissions by 68% since 2015 by utilizing more recycled aluminum, which drastically reduces carbon emissions associated with mineral extraction. In addition, Apple reached 100% renewable energy in 2018, and is urging companies throughout its supply chain to do the same. The Company has pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, eliminate plastic packaging by 2025, reduce water impacts in manufacturing, and increase energy efficiency in Apple stores,… Read more

On Tuesday, November 14, the EPA issued a proposed rule which would increase fees charged under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to manufacturers and handlers of chemical substances. The proposed rule would more than double the annual revenue the Agency receives from chemical manufacturers. In addition, it will increase the pool of companies subject to the fees to include processors, who mix, repackage, and otherwise work with chemicals without manufacturing them. Chemical manufacturers are required to pay these fees under TSCA to help defray a portion of the EPA’s cost to review both brand new chemicals and new uses… Read more

On August 16, the EPA released its frequently asked questions (“FAQ”) document advising state regulators to deny permits if applicants do not demonstrate compliance with the civil rights of affected persons and communities in addition to compliance with the environmental requirements of the permit. The document also includes details on how permit writers should measure and consider cumulative and desperate impacts to minority and disadvantaged communities. Multiple state authorities including those responsible for writing permits under Clear Air and Clean Water Act provisions have questioned the EPA’s authority to require them to consider factors beyond environmental compliance in permitting decisions…. Read more

The EPA’s revised lead strategy has cleared the interagency review process, and is expected to be released later this year. The revised strategy outlines the EPA’s intent to work with other federal agencies such as the CDC to review and revise its lead soil policy which was last updated in 1998. The draft strategy states that it would set new recommendations for screening sites for remediation, and strengthen preliminary remediation goals to reduce lead exposure in accordance with the latest science. The new strategy is in keeping with the EPA’s current mandate which is designed to support all offices within… Read more

The EPA has announced that it will streamline review of new chemical substances that are used in the manufacture of electric vehicle batteries, and that can be used in other, vital emerging markets. The Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”) requires that new compounds which have not been made in or imported to the United States before must be reviewed and approved by the agency before production or importation. In order to make the needed safety review of such new chemicals simpler, the agency will offer a streamlined process similar to the one it launched earlier in 2022 for biofuels. For… Read more