In December 29, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of the antitrust claims asserted against a hospital by a cardiology group because the group failed to establish a proper relevant market as the necessary predicate. However, the Court also upheld the district court’s refusal to tax discovery-related copying expenses against the cardiology group, noting that district courts are not required to tax discovery-related expenses and a number of Eighth Circuit district courts have refused to do so. Nonprofits involved in antitrust litigation in federal court should be aware that they may not recover discovery-related expenses, even if they are victorious in the underlying litigation.