Is it possible for a person’s reputation to be so bad the he is, in effect, “libel-proof” and not at risk of “incremental harm” from allegedly defamatory statements? A recent lawsuit, between two former New York Mets teammates, addressed that question. Lenny Dykstra, a former Major League Baseball player, sued his former Met’s teammate Ron Darling, and the publishers St. Martin’s Press, LLC and Macmillan Publishing Group LLC, for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress, based upon allegedly defamatory statements about him in the Darling’s book. In 2019, Darling and his ghostwriter David Paisner, through St. Martin’s and Macmillan,… Read more
Articles
Comments on Use of Survey Evidence in Trademark Litigation Submitted to the Intellectual Property Court of the Russian Federation
The following responds to a request by the Intellectual Property Court of the Russian Federation (IPC) for public comments on the Court’s development of methodological recommendations for the judicial assessment of consumer survey evidence in American trademark infringement cases. Survey results are typically used as evidence that a trademark is recognized as famous, distinctive, or a designation of origin or source, or that the mark is descriptive or generic for particular goods and services. The purpose of developing these recommendations is to consider how such polls should be conducted and what factors to consider when evaluating them. The Court is… Read more
Legal Fencing After Motorcycle Collides With a Horse on Route 197
The number and frequency of contentious disputes and complicated and protracted proceedings– involving many parties, claims/counterclaims and cross-claims and a plethora of legal issues — is not limited to multi-tranche collateralized debt obligations litigation reported on the front page of the New York Law Journal. As a recent case illustrates, an accident involving a motorcycle and two horses that occurred on June 12, 2017, at approximately 10:17 PM, on the roadway in front of 229 State Route 197, Fort Edward, Washington County, had almost as many moving parties and parts as the most complex New York County suit– even though… Read more
Precariously Pitched Pipe Meets a Failed Flange at the Madison Square Condominium
A high-rise residential condominium community is a creature of statute, characterized by many unique features that both govern day-to-day affairs, on the one hand, while leading to disputes and litigation, on the other. So-called “common elements” are the responsibility of the board of managers to maintain and repair. But, as a recent case involving an improperly-pitched/leak-causing pipe between to units demonstrates, what constitutes a “common element” is often a controverted question of fact. Lisa Goldberg sued the Madison Square Condominium and George Higgins for breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and trespass as a result of recurring leaks in her apartment. The… Read more
Business Judgment Rule Not a License to Ignore POA Declaration
Almost every aspect of residential community life and governance may be subject to differences of opinion, second guessing and litigation— the outcome of which may depend on the application of the “business judgment rule”. But, as a recent case demonstrates, that rule is irrelevant where the contested action violates the community’s governing document. Peter Beckerman is a homeowner and member of the Lattingtown Harbor Property Owners Association, Inc. The POA is governed by the Board of Directors. On behalf of the POA, the Board entered into a license agreement with another member of the POA, Peter Tully. The license granted… Read more
Neighbors at 25 CPW: “Nattering Nabobs of Negatavism”*
Charges and countercharges by apartment neighbors are commonplace in residential buildings. Occasionally, disputes involve facts, circumstances, personalities and conduct that, as a recent case shows, defy the ordinary. 25 CPW City Views, LLC and Hedy Sloan Stempler sought a preliminary enjoining Linda Cohen from: (1) contacting Stempler or any occupant of apartment 18H at 25 Central Park West; (2) appearing at the front door of 18H; (3) ringing the doorbell of 18H; (4) placing any material under the door of 18H;(5) shouting, screaming, yelling, or engaging in physical or verbal threats directed at Stempler or any occupant of 18H; (6) engaging in any assault, abuse, harassment,… Read more
Will the Court Intervene? “[When] Smoke Gets in Your Eyes”*
Some “neighborly” legal disputes are like an Agatha Christie “whodunit”. A recent forensic “thriller” involved two East 83rd Street apartment tenants who had lived in the building for 30 years, a nosy tenant next door and a ubiquitous building super—in a jurisprudential search for the “smoking [one]”. The landlord imposed a smoke-free environmental policy in March, in the midst of the Coronavirus pandemic, which forced many of the building’s tenants to be home 24/7. Signage in the lobby requested that all smoking be done outside and at least 15 feet away from the building. J&P Realty, LLC, as landlord, sued… Read more
“Water Closet” Brawl Ends in a Legal Draw
Every square inch of space allotted to an apartment in an Upper East Side high-rise residential cooperative has utility and value. And, as appeared in a recent case, when the area in dispute is nine square feet outside a hallway door, the legal claims and issues escalate disproportionately. Donald Fellner is the owner of shares and holder of a proprietary lease in co-op apartment 12C at 40 East 88th Street. The residential cooperative is 44 East 88 Owners, Inc. And Orsid Realty Corp is the managing agent. The dispute was over a very small area, approximately nine square feet, adjacent to… Read more
What is a (Door) Man to Do? Level of Lobby Care Required After a Storm
When it rains it pours. And sometimes litigation en(sues). Janice Kasni lived at 30 Lincoln Plaza located on 30 West 63rd Street. Shortly after midnight, Kasni returned from an evening out, when she slipped and fell on the floor of the lobby. It had rained for much of day before the accident and long brown rugs had been placed from the doors to the lobby to the elevator bank. When Kasni entered the building, she stepped onto the rug in front of the door and then headed left towards a couch that was near the entrance—and stepped off the rug… Read more
New York Court of Appeals (March/April 2020)
The middle of the 2019-2020 Term of the Court featured only a handful of dispositions on civil matters, but no landmark decisions. Two opinions by Judge Stein, relating to the General Business Law and the arbitration process, do provide templates for future GBL claims and arbitration proceedings. Plavin v. Group Health Inc. March 24, 2020 Question: The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit asked the Court of Appeals to decide whether Steven Plavin sufficiently alleged consumer-oriented conduct to assert claims under General Business Law §§ 349 and 350 for damages. An insurance company’s allegedly made materially misleading representations directly to… Read more