Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP

Menu Search

Experience

  • Industries
  • Services
  • Professionals

Resources

  • SGR Insights
  • News & Events
  • Client Access

About

  • The Firm
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • SGR Alumni
Share
  • Home
  • Newsletters
  • ERISA Newsletter
  • California Adopts New Worker Classification Test

California Adopts New Worker Classification Test

Last week, the California Supreme Court adopted the “ABC” test – a test utilized in other jurisdictions – for determining “employee” versus “independent contractor” status in California.  Prior to last week’s decision, California companies utilized a multifactor test, which (along with additional factors) focused primarily on whether the company had control over the individual and the means by which the work was performed.
New ABC Test.  Under the new test, workers are presumed to be employees, unless a company can satisfy all of the “ABC” conditions:

  • Part A – The worker is free from the control and direction of the company in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact.
  • Part B – The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the company’s business.
  • Part C – The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the company.

Impact For Employers.  The new ABC test likely will make it harder for companies to classify workers as independent contractors.  Under the new test, individuals previously classified as independent contractors may now have to be reclassified as employees.  This means that any company engaging independent contractors in California will face increased exposure to claims relating to:

  • California’s minimum wage, overtime, and break time rules.
  • California’s state and local paid sick leave laws and state or local laws regulating vacation time and other types of leave.
  • The company’s vicarious liability for an employee’s negligence.

While it is not clear at this point, the new ruling may increase exposure and expense related to employment tax reporting and withholding obligations with respect to reclassified employees.

Contact Information.  For more information, please contact Don Mazursky (404.888.8840), Randall Constantine (404.888.8877), Emily Friedman (404.888.8871) or Alex Smith (404.888.8839).

Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP

SGRLAW®

Experience

  • Industries
  • Services
  • Professionals

Resources

  • SGR Insights
  • News & Events
  • Client Access

About

  • The Firm
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • SGR Alumni

Notices

  • Site Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Transparency In Coverage Rule

Languages

  • Español
  • Deutsch
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中文
  • Visit our Twitter profile
  • Visit our LinkedIn page
  • Visit our YouTube channel
  • Chambers and Partners Best Law Firms
Search
Remote Access

© 2026 Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • More Networks
Share via
Facebook
X (Twitter)
LinkedIn
Mix
Email
Print
Copy Link
Powered by Social Snap
Copy link
CopyCopied
Powered by Social Snap
This website uses cookies to improve functionality and performance. If you continue browsing the site, you are giving implied consent to the use of cookies on this website.