The Georgia Supreme Court Stays the Course on Personal Jurisdiction Over Non-Resident Corporations

Legal Alert

In recent decisions, the United States Supreme Court has limited the scope of general personal jurisdiction— that is whether a non-resident corporation can be sued in a particular state on any cause of action, even those that do not arise out of events that occurred in that state. Most states, including Georgia, have statutes that allow non-resident corporations to register to do business in that state. If a corporation takes that step, has it consented to be sued in that state on any possible cause of action? The Georgia Supreme Court recently addressed that question in Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. McCall, Case No. S20G1368 (decided September 21, 2021).

Cooper Tire had been sued in the state court in Georgia in a personal injury case. But, none of the events giving rise to the personal injury case occurred in Georgia. Cooper Tire was incorporated and headquartered outside of Georgia, but it had registered to do business in Georgia and appointed a registered agent for service of process in Georgia. The case presented the question of whether Cooper Tire had consented to be sued in Georgia by registering to do business in Georgia.

The Georgia Supreme Court found that Cooper Tire had consented to be sued. The Georgia Supreme Court cited to an older United States Supreme Court decision in which that court had concluded that a corporation consented to the jurisdictions of a state court by registering to do business in that state. The Georgia Supreme Court noted that the United States Supreme Court had recently trimmed back the scope of general personal jurisdiction over non-resident corporations. However, in those recent cases, it had not expressly overruled the older decision recognizing general jurisdiction by consent. After weighing a number of factors, the Georgia Supreme Court declined to overrule one of its previous decisions in which it had held that a corporation that registers to do business in Georgia must be treated as a resident.

The Court noted that courts in other states have taken differing positions on whether a non-resident corporation consent to general personal jurisdiction by registering to do business. This may be an issue the United States Supreme Court needs to resolve.

The opinion is available at https://www.gasupreme.us/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/s20g1368.pdf

Related Capabilities

Media Contact

Public Relations Contact
Kate Lenders
Senior Marketing Manager
klenders@sgrlaw.com
312-360-6478

Jump to Page

Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek
balustrade37