Edward A. Pennington

Partner / Washington, DC

Edward A. Pennington is a Partner in the Intellectual Property Practice of Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP.

  • Full Bio

    Mr. Pennington is a registered patent attorney with an educational background in both physics and economics. He also taught statistics in college while attending graduate school on a Teaching Fellowship. His interest in litigation started early in his career, taking court appointed indigent criminal defense cases to gain immediate courtroom experience. Almost immediately out of school, he tried to a verdict a successful Lanham Act defensive action in the Western District of Pennsylvania, and followed that up with a continuous stream of patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, and contract trials and settlements over the last 30 years. His litigation matters have spanned virtually every technical field, including vaccines, viral vectors and related bio-pharma technologies; computer hardware and software; location technology such as personal navigation, geo-fencing, telematics and VOIP-based 9-1-1 call routing; cellular wireless encoding schemes including CDMA, GSM, 3G, 4G, LTE, and 5G and corresponding standards; WIFI networks, power control and various standards; encryption and cryptography; nuclear reactors; materials science including alloys, ceramics and plastics; 3D printing; aircraft engines; diesel and gasoline engine design and components; electric power storage and generation, including solar arrays, wind turbines, and nuclear fusion and fission; coatings and substrates; sporting equipment including golf clubs, balls and gloves, martial arts protective equipment; water sports including sail boards, kayaks, foam flotation devices and powered craft; and medical devices including artificial joints and spinal implants, dental implants and surgical techniques, endoscopes, surgical clamps, catheters, surgical devices and valves; and satellite communications including DBS transmission and reception, antennas, transmitters, GPS, and other space based communication networks and systems such as IRIDIUM constellation satellites, receivers and transmitters.

    Mr. Pennington has been admitted to, and practiced in, all major patent venues, and a good number of minor ones, including the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, the Eastern District of Texas, the Southern, Middle and Northern Districts of Florida, the Eastern District of Virginia, the District of Maryland, the District of New Jersey, the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and all of the Districts Courts of California. He has also tried patent cases before the U.S. International Trade Commission, and maintains an active docket there. His clients over the years have included major universities, U.S. governmental research laboratories, defense contractors, Fortune 50 companies, as well as independent inventors, research laboratories and smaller, growth oriented and technology driven companies.

  • Representative Experience

    • Cassidian v. microData GIS, et al., E.D.Tx., 2:2012-cv-162 lead trial counsel securing jury verdict for the defendants, of invalidity on several grounds including inventorship, and non-infringement.  Patent covered 9-1-1 call routing on a VOIP platform.  Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law, filed by plaintiff, denied by district court judge.
    • Odorstar v. SMM Distributors, et al.,  S.D.Fla., 0:2013-cv-60136 won summary judgment of non-infringement for defendants on patent that covered chlorine dioxide cleaning solutions.  Plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in January 2015, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling of non-infringement.
    • Delorme Publishing Co. v. Briar Tek, E.D.Va., 1:2013-cv-640 won summary judgment of invalidity for declaratory judgment plaintiff, on patents covering communication network using Iridium satellite constellation and GPS location techniques.
    • Straight Path LLC v. Telesphere, E.D.Va., 1:2013-cv-937 obtained favorable settlement for defendant in a case involving a non-practicing entity’s patents that purported to cover VOIP communications.
    • Telecommunication Systems Inc. v. Porto, E.D.Va., 3:2014-cv-111 represented plaintiff in a Declaratory Judgment action seeking invalidation of patents that cover location technology, settled favorably with dismissal with prejudice.
    • Woosley v. Georgetown University, E.D.Va., 1:2000-cv-504 presented inventor of “Allegra” in dispute with University employer over distribution of proceeds received from research that led to the patented allergy medication, resulting in favorable settlement with University and third party graduate student who claimed to be a co-inventor.
    • Bavarian Nordic A/S v. Acambis, Inc., D. Del., 1:05-cv-614, Represented the owner of a patented viral strain in a suit for “conversion” of a sample of the viral strain.  Companion patent infringement case was pending at the International Trade Commission (ITC).  Case settled favorably after a global settlement with the competitor was negotiated.
    • Autocell Laboratories, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc., D. Del., 1:08-cv-760, Represented plaintiff in patent infringement case that involved dynamic power control for WIFI networks, dealing specifically with power control requirements under 802.11.  Patent portfolio involved over 50  patents. Patent in suit found valid on summary judgment.
    • Callaway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co., 576 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2009), Represented appellant/defendant in obtaining a new trial, and reversing a jury trial verdict of validity and infringement.  Patents related to the materials used in making golf balls.
    • PCT International Inc. v. John Mezzalingua Associates Inc., D. Del., 1:10-cv-00059, Represented defendant in a case involving “F-type” connectors used in the cable industry.  Case settled favorably before trial.
    • Vehicle IP LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al., D. Del., 1:09-cv-1007, pending, Representing one of several defendants in a case involving location services used on cell phones and other devices.
    • Taser Int’l. Inc. v. Karbon Arms LLC, D. Del., 1:11-cv-426, pending, Representing defendant in patent suit involving stun guns.
    • Taser Int’l. Inc. v. Stinger Systems, Inc., D. Az., 2:07-cv-42, Represented defendant in a contempt proceeding; bench trial resulted in finding of no infringement by design-around product.
    • Smart Trike USA LLC v. Heinz Kettler GmbH, D.N.J., 2:10-cv-2063, Represented accused infringer in declaratory judgment action, case settled favorably to client after four days of trial.
    • Cardpool, Inc. v. Plastic Jungle, Inc., N.D. Cal., 3:12-cv-4182, pending, Representing plaintiff on patent covering debit and gift card redemption program.
    • Bavarian Nordic A/S v. Oxford Biomedica PLC, S.D.Cal., 3:08-cv-1156, Represented patent holder in case involving patented cancer fighting biotechnology.  Case settled after defendant failed to dismiss case under the “safe harbor” provisions of the Hatch Waxman Act.
    • Netropa Corp. v. Telecommunication Systems, Inc., C.D.Ca., 2:12-cv-4927, pending, Representing defendant in a copyright and breach of contract case involving a former software programmer.
    • National Black Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. US Black Chamber, D.D.C., 1:10-cv-1755, pending, Representing defendant in a trademark case between competing chambers of commerce.
    • Tendler Cellular of Texas, LLC v. MetroPCS Communications, Inc., et al., E.D.Tx., 6:11-cv-178, Represented defendant in a patent case involving navigation functionality of cellular telephones.  Settled favorably before trial.
    • Levine v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, et al., E.D.Tx., 2:09-cv-372, Represented one of several defendants in a suit involving navigation functionality of cellular telephones.  Settled favorably before trial.
    • IP Venture, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, et al., N.D.Ca., cv 10-04755, Represented on of several defendants in a suit involving navigation functionality of cellular telephones.  Settled favorably before trial.
    • Traffic Information, LLC v. Cricket Communications, Inc., E.D.Tx., 2:10-cv-226, Represented defendant in a patent case involving traffic identification on a cellular telephone.  Settled favorably before trial.
    • Office of Strategic Services, Inc. v. Sedeghian et al., E.D.Tx., 1:11-cv-195, Represented defendants in a trademark, tortious interference, and breach of fiduciary duty claim arising from a hostile corporate break up.  Case decided in favor of defendants on summary judgment.
    • Microsoft Corp. v. Computer Warehouse, Inc., et al., E.D.Va., 1:11-cv-491, Represented defendants in a copyright infringement case based on re-loading operating system software after computer refurbishing.  Case settled favorably before trial.
    • QNX Software Systems GmbH v. Netrino LLC, D.Md., 1:09-cv-2206, Represented defendant in a trademark case involving software.  Case settled favorably before trial.
    • TracBeam, LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al., E.D.Tx., 6:11-cv-96, pending, Representing multiple defendants in patent case involving 911 services and location based services for cellular telephone.
    • Patent Licensing and Investment, LLC v. Green Jets, Inc., S.D.Fla., 9:11-cv-80689, Represented defendant in a patent case involving business methodology for operating a private jet company.  Case dismissed in favor of defendant after discovery.
    • Verizon Services Corp. et al. v. Cox Fibernet Virginia LLC, E.D.Va., 1:08-cv-57, Assisted defense of case involving Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) patents, succeeded at trial in invalidating claims.
    • Microsoft Corp. v. Computer Warehouse, Inc., et al., E.D.Va., 1:11-cv-491, Represented defendants in a copyright infringement case based on re-loading operating system software after computer refurbishing.  Case settled favorably before trial.
    • QNX Software Systems GmbH v. Netrino LLC, D.Md., 1:09-cv-2206, Represented defendant in a trademark case involving software.  Case settled favorably before trial.
    • TracBeam, LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al., E.D.Tx., 6:11-cv-96, pending, Representing multiple defendants in patent case involving 911 services and location based services for cellular telephone.
    • Patent Licensing and Investment, LLC v. Green Jets, Inc., S.D.Fla., 9:11-cv-80689, Represented defendant in a patent case involving business methodology for operating a private jet company.  Case dismissed in favor of defendant after discovery.
    • Verizon Services Corp. et al. v. Cox Fibernet Virginia LLC, E.D.Va., 1:08-cv-57, Assisted defense of case involving Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) patents, succeeded at trial in invalidating claims.

  • Bar Admissions

    District of Columbia
    Virginia

  • Education

    Undergraduate
    • West Virginia University

    Law School
    • George Mason University School of Law

    Graduate School
    • West Virginia University

  • Memberships

    American Bar Association
    American Intellectual Property Law Association
    Virginia State Bar, Intellectual Property Law Section
    Licensing Executives Society

  • Recognitions


    Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers (2014, 2016, 2017)
    "IP Star", Managing Intellectual Property Magazine (2018)
    Washington, D.C. Top Lawyers, The Washington Post Magazine (2019)

  • Publications


    Lecturer, Implications of the Verizon-Vonage Patent Infringement Judgment, VON Conference (March 19, 2007).

  • Other Publications